Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Twingo Discussions by Generation
Twingo Renaultsport 133
Pistonheads - 133 vs 182 review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Twingo Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alex_225" data-source="post: 124638" data-attributes="member: 79"><p>It's a good bit of reading although I'm not sure I agree with all of it, well mainly where it says, </p><p></p><p>"similar height, similar roof-lines, similar stance, similar-looking bonnets, windscreens, B-pillars..."</p><p></p><p>Now I have one of each and park my 172 right alongside my other half's 133. The 172 is noticeably lower, in terms of how you get into the car and looking at the roofline side by side, a good few inches different. The 133 is taller in stance on it's bigger wheels the 172 looks more low slung and in turn looks longer, even if it's not. </p><p></p><p>I get the impression they mistake the fact that it is a Renault with the fact that the Twingo is based on the Clio MKII and that by default it will have similarities. In the same sense I can climb into a Clio 197/200 and see similarities with my Megane.</p><p></p><p>I guess I just mean that as much as they share the same platform and are equally fun for different reasons, they're not as similar in my opinion as they let on in that article.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alex_225, post: 124638, member: 79"] It's a good bit of reading although I'm not sure I agree with all of it, well mainly where it says, "similar height, similar roof-lines, similar stance, similar-looking bonnets, windscreens, B-pillars..." Now I have one of each and park my 172 right alongside my other half's 133. The 172 is noticeably lower, in terms of how you get into the car and looking at the roofline side by side, a good few inches different. The 133 is taller in stance on it's bigger wheels the 172 looks more low slung and in turn looks longer, even if it's not. I get the impression they mistake the fact that it is a Renault with the fact that the Twingo is based on the Clio MKII and that by default it will have similarities. In the same sense I can climb into a Clio 197/200 and see similarities with my Megane. I guess I just mean that as much as they share the same platform and are equally fun for different reasons, they're not as similar in my opinion as they let on in that article. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Twingo Discussions by Generation
Twingo Renaultsport 133
Pistonheads - 133 vs 182 review
Top