RS GORDINI
Well-known member
Done a couple of runs today and thought i would post it up.The graph shows 107.6hp atw and 104lb/ft.These are at the wheels numbers
What would that make the guessimated flywheel figure?RS GORDINI":21aruygk said:Done a couple of runs today and thought i would post it up.The graph shows 107.6hp atw and 104lb/ft.These are at the wheels numbers
I see what what your saying but coming from a turbo car with a remap and the thought of doing the same to a N/A car doesnt seem worth it imo.As for the meet and a run,i would be up for that if there is enough in S/E to get one together.orbital":3lgowxwh said:133 is worth a map, improves the lower rev range soooo much. dont forget they gave it 4-1 collector so on paper that would give more high end power for cost lower down. remaps i've seen keep the top end but makes the lower end so much better to drive with
and thats from 3 tuner views and ££££ spent lol.
nice to see the graphs and that. would be a sweet trick to have that for a meet so people could have a run up and down with it
Matthias":30789qzc said:I'm getting kinda puzzled with all this bung in/bung out stuff. I red a lot about it and decided to take mine out, did notice a massive difference to the sound but no notable difference in performance drop or increase. Are you saying that you lost 9hp with the bung out and if so, what do the rest of the people here think about that? I’m not all about performance, but the only thing that Twingo lacks (and even that is questionable – good driver doesn’t need a lot of HP to do good against others) is a couple of extra HP or at least keeping it with the promised level of 133 HP. Let me know what you/others think about it. I don’t want to put it back in, but then again if it “drops” the “performance” for 9HP, then I might reconsider.
Cheers
Enter your email address to join: