It would be do-able on light boost.Daveyb133":17fbwgkf said:isnt the rs engine compression to high for a turbo
Stunty":udo4exum said:But a Megane isn't a Twingo. I bought the 133 because I like small cars and I liked the look of it, it wasn't really to do with money or insurance costs (I'm 32 with 12 years NCB). I enjoy tinkering and having my cars tuned over standard - if I had a 225 I'd still be tuning that
If you like NA that's cool as I do too. I've been a big Honda fan over the years but there's no denying the extra flexibility of turbo engines. Ooh and the whooshing noise of a turbo is cool too.
Matt":1o3n17ui said:The low pressure clio kit doesn't require any internal modification so I guess that's what you should compare to. I'd imagine a smaller turbo (perhaps T25 rather than T28) and lower boost would provide a safe forced induction pressure for a Twingo to run 40BHP increase seems reasonable without touching the internals to me...
Stunty":3p2pgt8p said:But a Megane isn't a Twingo. I bought the 133 because I like small cars and I liked the look of it
I think a Twingo with about 160 bhp would be a nice number.singlespeed":8t6qji1z said:Would a turbo conversion add to or detract from the overall driving experience?
Obviously there would be more power, but would the delivery suit the handling and balance or it it just a recipe for checking out the nearest field... Discuss
Enter your email address to join: